Authors
Homer
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
The name ancient Greek tradition gives to the poet, or poets, credited with the Iliad and the Odyssey, the foundational epics of the Greek literary tradition and, through their enormous later influence, of the wider Western one. Ancient sources already disagreed about him: several cities claimed to be his birthplace, and ancient scholars debated whether both epics could be the work of one poet. Modern scholarship on oral-formulaic composition, chiefly the work of Milman Parry and Albert Lord in the twentieth century, showed that the poems' repeated epithets and formulas are the signature of a long oral performance tradition, which reopened rather than settled the question of what, if anything, 'Homer' names as a single historical individual. See the Homeric Question.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Epic, Genres Primary epics such as those of Homer are the genre's founding, oral-tradition examples.
In Genre
Influenced
Virgil modelled the Aeneid on Homer's two epics: the first six books on the Odyssey, the last six on the Iliad.
Works Attributed
The Iliad, Works Why this is disputed. Attribution to a single poet named Homer is itself the Homeric Question; the poem is cited here under the traditional attribution, which remains the scholarly convention even though it is not treated as settled fact.
The Odyssey, Works Why this is disputed. Homeric authorship of the Odyssey is separately and more sharply debated than the Iliad's in modern Homeric scholarship; see The Homeric Question.
Sources
Open Questions (1 open question)
The Homeric Question
Whether Homer names a single historical poet, several poets, or is essentially a name attached after the fact to a long, collective oral tradition, cannot be settled from the evidence that survives: no contemporary biography exists, ancient sources already disagreed, and the internal evidence of oral-formulaic composition is consistent with more than one account of authorship.
What would resolve this No plausible new evidence is expected; the question is treated by classicists as a permanent interpretive one about how oral tradition, individual authorship and textual fixation relate to each other, rather than a fact-finding gap a future discovery would close.
Classical philology and the study of oral-formulaic compositionThe Norton Anthology of World Literature
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.