Literature Atlas

How Stories Are Told
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Article

A Translation More Famous Than Its Original

Learn More
A Translation More Famous Than Its Original

This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.

Edward FitzGerald published his Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam in 1859, at his own expense, and it sold so poorly that the unsold stock ended up in a bookseller's penny bargain box, where the scholar Whitley Stokes discovered it in July 1861, about two years after publication, and brought it to the attention of Dante Gabriel Rossetti and other Pre-Raphaelite friends who made its reputation. FitzGerald was not translating in any strict sense; he compressed, reordered, invented transitions between quatrains that had no fixed sequence in his Persian sources, and wrote in his own letters that he preferred a lively rendering to a literal one, transplanting Khayyam's wine, roses and mortality into a fluent nineteenth-century English idiom that reads more like FitzGerald's own poem in Khayyam's voice than a strict rendering of any single Persian text. Later, more scholarly, more literal translations of Khayyam exist and are more accurate to what the underlying Persian quatrains actually say; almost none of them are the version English readers know by heart. FitzGerald's free translation is, by a wide margin, the more famous poem, in English, than anything closer to Khayyam's own words has ever managed to become.

Connections

Article On

The Rubaiyat, Forms
Sources
The Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics
Princeton University Press
  • Fourth Edition, s.v. Ruba'i
  • editorial: review note
Fitz, by John Bayley (London Review of Books)
Fitz essay
Quote, Fitz essay
In 1861, two years after its appearance, a young Celtic scholar called Whitley Stokes fished several copies out of the bargain box and gave some to friends, including Monckton Milnes, Richard Burton and D.G. Rossetti.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.